Clinicians field self-harm and suicidal ideation disclosures constantly, yet many still default to reflexive hospitalization, or just as often, underestimate risk because they're unsure what the behavior actually means. This live 2-hour training gives clinicians a structured, defensible way to assess and respond to self-injury and suicidal ideation, moving beyond gut instinct toward a repeatable protocol.
Participants will learn to distinguish non-suicidal self-injury from suicidal ideation, and to differentiate respondent (automatic) suicidal ideation from operant (functional) suicidal ideation, a distinction that changes the entire treatment response. The session walks through a full risk assessment protocol, from safety planning through the criteria for an emergency petition, along with the language clients use to describe pain that is not suicidal ideation but is often treated as though it is. Participants will also review the ASAM's six dimension of care criteria to support sound, defensible level-of-care decisions.